Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!mimsy!mojo!stripes
From: stripes@eng.umd.edu (Joshua Osborne)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
Subject: Re: Dyalog APL vs APL*PLUS UNX
Message-ID: <1990Mar17.100910.6097@eng.umd.edu>
Date: 17 Mar 90 10:09:10 GMT
References: <6251@umd5.umd.edu> <186@kepler1.UUCP>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (The News System)
Organization: Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Lines: 14

In article <186@kepler1.UUCP> rjfrey@kepler1.UUCP (Robert J Frey) writes:
>In article <6251@umd5.umd.edu> jph@suns.UMD.EDU (J. Patrick Harrington) writes:
>We have Dyalog APL running on a SUN Sparc and on 386's. I've used both Dyalog's
>and STSC's UNIX-based products and I prefer Dyalog's. This is based, 
>however, less on speed benchmarks and more on how well integrated they are 
>into the UNIX environment, bundled software and special features such as 
>Dyalog's wonderful quadSM facility.
What is quadSM?  Is it anything like IBM/STSC's quadNA?
-- 
           stripes@eng.umd.edu          "Security for Unix is like
      Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The          Mutitasking for MS-DOS"
      "The dyslexic porgramer"                  - Kevin Lockwood
"Don't try to change C into some nice, safe, portable programming language
 with all sharp edges removed, pick another language."  - John Limpert