Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sdrc!scjones
From: scjones@sdrc.UUCP (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C style peeve
Keywords: return
Message-ID: <1207@sdrc.UUCP>
Date: 18 Mar 90 22:31:35 GMT
References: <2205@osc.COM>
Organization: SDRC, Cincinnati
Lines: 24

In article <2205@osc.COM>, jgk@osc.COM (Joe Keane) writes:
> [ return(2+2) instead of return 2+2 ]
> 
> It's a shame the compiler lets them get away with it, and i think the extra
> parentheses should be strictly illegal.  Unfortunately, for some reason the
> ANSI committee didn't like this suggestion.

Say what?!?  The thing after the return keyword in an
>expression<.  Expressions, last I heard, are allowed to contain
parentheses -- even redundant ones.  Do you want to disallow all
redundant parentheses?  Some redundant parentheses?  What?

Personally, I find the idea morally repugnant.  I happen to agree
with you that the parentheses on return statements are ugly and
people who use them should be severely teased, but trying to
change the language to enforce a particular style is way out of
line.
----
Larry Jones                         UUCP: uunet!sdrc!scjones
SDRC                                      scjones@SDRC.UU.NET
2000 Eastman Dr.                    BIX:  ltl
Milford, OH  45150-2789             AT&T: (513) 576-2070
"You know how Einstein got bad grades as a kid?  Well MINE are even WORSE!"
-Calvin