Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!xylogics!transfer!lectroid!pearl!bad
From: bad@pearl.sw.stratus.com (Bruce Dumes)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: DEFINITE bug in Turbo C 2.0 (WHO'S GOT THE BUG????)
Message-ID: <946@lectroid.sw.stratus.com>
Date: 22 Mar 90 18:37:28 GMT
References: <802@zeusa.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@lectroid.sw.stratus.com
Reply-To: bad@pearl.sw.stratus.com (Bruce Dumes)
Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering.
Lines: 58

In article <802@zeusa.UUCP> hendrik@zeusa.UUCP (Hendrik Vermooten) writes:
>Here is a definite bug in C (discovered by Renier v. Wyk)
>
>Run by Turbo C it gives:
>
>144
>100
>132
>110
>
>And run by Microsoft C (under XENIX):
>
>132
>110
>132
>110
>

hey , interestingly enough, when I ran it on my sun 3/80 using cc I got:

132
100
132
100

when I put a semi-colon after the #include <stdio.h> and recompiled with
			cc I got:

132
100
132
110

and when I ran it on my sun compiled with gcc I got:

144
100
144
100

and when I ran it on a Stratus Computer with the Stratus C compiler I got:

132
110
132
110

which is the only version that agreed with Microsoft.  (If the versions were
voting I guess this one would win).

WHO'S GOT THE BUG?????



--
Bruce Dumes			|	"Massachusetts has the best 
bad@pearl.sw.stratus.com	|	 politicians money can buy"
Stratus Computer, Inc.