Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!pikes!aspen.craycos.com!pmk
From: pmk@craycos.com (Peter Klausler)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: setjmp() (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
Message-ID: <1990Mar22.170422.9437@craycos.com>
Date: 22 Mar 90 17:04:22 GMT
Organization: Cray Computer Corporation
Lines: 11

OOPS! My C code example in a previous posting was quite incorrect; the call
to j() is dead in f() irrespective of the presence of the setjmp. SORRY!

What I MEANT to show was that the presence of setjmp()s and function calls
in a C function implies flow-of-control that isn't explicit in the syntax of
the program. But my example in which this could cause problems in an optimizer
was wrong.

My apologies to all confused by this.

-Peter Klausler @ Cray Computer