Xref: utzoo comp.lang.lisp:2958 comp.lang.smalltalk:1791 comp.lang.c++:6906 comp.unix.questions:20730
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!rutgers!att!cbnewsc!lgm
From: lgm@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (lawrence.g.mayka)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.c++,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Object Oriented Languages for the NeXT
Keywords: Next Object Oriented
Message-ID: <14518@cbnewsc.ATT.COM>
Date: 20 Mar 90 14:21:38 GMT
References: <2074@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Reply-To: lgm@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (lawrence.g.mayka,ihp,)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

In article <2074@skye.ed.ac.uk> jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton) writes:
>In article <14474@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> lgm@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (lawrence.g.mayka,ihp,) writes:
>>I believe that Allegro Common Lisp comes standard on the NeXT
>>machine, presumably including both (Old) Flavors and the new
>>standard Common Lisp Object System (CLOS).
>
>Does "Allegro" mean the Coral one or the Franz Inc. one?

Coral Software only sold Common Lisp for the Macintosh, I
believe.  In fact, Coral was absorbed by Apple Computer last
year.  Its product may even have been renamed Apple Common Lisp, I
think.


	Lawrence G. Mayka
	AT&T Bell Laboratories
	lgm@ihlpf.att.com

Standard disclaimer.