Xref: utzoo comp.os.mach:322 comp.os.v:60
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!wuarchive!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!malcolm
From: malcolm@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Malcolm Lui)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach,comp.os.v
Subject: Which is better, process-based OS or object-based OS?
Message-ID: <33030@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Date: 15 Mar 90 00:51:26 GMT
Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU
Reply-To: malcolm@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Malcolm Lui)
Distribution: usa
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Lines: 22

In your opinion, which type of operating system do you think is
better, process-based OS such as Mach, or object-based OS such as
Cronus?

Could you also please explain why?

I feel that object-based OS may have the edge due to:

		 - Capabilities for control of object access and modification
		 - Encapsulation that allows for easy design of objects.
		 - Nested objects

I'm sure that processer-based OS have their advantages, but I
am not familiar enough with them.

Do you have any opinion on either type of OS?

Thanks for your time and ideas.

Malcolm Lui

E-mail: malcolm@CS.UCLA.EDU  or  ...!{trwspp,cepu,uclachem}!ucla-cs!malcolm