Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stc!datlog!mlegge
From: mlegge@datlog.co.uk ( Martyn Legge)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Re: MS-OS2 ?
Message-ID: <2791@dlvax2.datlog.co.uk>
Date: 16 Mar 90 10:07:01 GMT
References: <37555@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <2536@legs.UUCP>
Organization: Data Logic Ltd, Queens House, Greenhill Way, Harrow, London.
Lines: 13

dash@legs.UUCP (Darrell Shively) writes:

>	By the way; since your machine is a 386 based system, do NOT use
>IBM OS/2 1.1 (either EE or SE).   The IBM versions of OS/2 1.1 for the AT 
>does not support the 386.  After all, IBM does not make a 386 equipped AT
>machine.  

What is this nonsense?  
I use OS/2 EE 1.1 from IBM on my 25Mhz Compaq 386 and it 
works fine.  There's no difference in the kernel only the 
device drivers between the MCA and AT bus machines.

Martyn Legge