Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!jarthur!uci-ics!gateway
From: S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: RFC 1148
Message-ID: <1050.637488975@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: 15 Mar 90 09:12:07 GMT
Lines: 23
Approved: usenet@PARIS.ICS.UCI.EDU
Phone: +44-1-380-7294

Jon,

I'm not sure that re-issue was the only approach (I was at least hoping to
have a brief discussion as to the best approach).  I think that there should
have been at least a note explaining the difference between this and RFC
1138.   The two numbers will be very confusing.

Given a full update, there are three things I would like to get in:

1) Some cosmetic improvements to the layout of DRs.  A few small changes can
make a big improvement in readability (this is based on implmentation, and
trying to make easy sense of real DRs).

2) Some fixes relating to redirects.  Essentially, the current approach is
completely broken.

3) Some clarifications on forwarding multiple body parts (text is confusing).

I'd be inclined to ask if there are any other changes which people want to
see.


Steve