Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!sumax!polari!root
From: root@polari.UUCP (The Super User)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Proposing a new "shareware.*" news heirarchy
Message-ID: <1378@polari.UUCP>
Date: 16 Mar 90 07:18:52 GMT
References: <5002@macom1.UUCP> <514@limbo.Intuitive.Com> <35243@watmath.waterloo.edu> <1376@polari.UUCP> <11021@sequoia.execu.com>
Reply-To: root@.UUCP (The Super User)
Organization: PolarServ, Seattle WA
Lines: 15


  So take the  raw data and publish  your findings.  I'll mail it to you.
The comments about "yes, but with restrictions" were more along the lines
of "jeez, if it's GOTTA BE on the network,  it should be a in a group that
I don't have to carry.  "  Period.  Sure, there's some interpretations of
this, but that's closer (in my opinion) to a NO than to a YES.  So yea,
I'm lumping the "no", and "yes with restrictions into one.  Your email
about my posting as root, funny enough, wasn't the one I was responding
to, though I used a couple of your words.   Check it out for yourself.

   Anyways, I'm hardly an unbiased person in this.  So why don't you
do a workup on the raw data and publish it as a disinterested party?  

 In other words, if you're unhappy with what I posted, I'll flood your
mailbox and let you do the work.  Fair enough?