Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: What does free mean.
Message-ID: <15269@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Date: 19 Mar 90 16:09:53 GMT
References: <1151@mtxinu.UUCP> <1990Mar14.234322.16167@NCoast.ORG> <6110@becker.UUCP>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff)
Distribution: usa
Lines: 10

I don't see what's wrong with separate commercial and non-commercial
code domains.  If I were releasing a commercial package, I would eat
live eels rather than include GNU or public domain code in it!  Have we
no pride in our work any more?

Maybe you could make an argument that FSF is messing with freeware but
commercial developers haven't got a leg to stand on criticizing it.
-- 
"DO NOT, repeat, DO NOT blow the hatch!"  /)\   Tom Neff
"Roger....hatch blown!"                   \(/   tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET