Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!isgate!krafla!einari From: einari@rhi.hi.is (Einar Indridason) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Why does 'stevie' mask the 8th bit ? Message-ID: <1590@krafla.rhi.hi.is> Date: 20 Mar 90 23:03:00 GMT References: <1581@krafla.rhi.hi.is> <14602@s.ms.uky.edu> <3052@auspex.auspex.com> <14614@s.ms.uky.edu> Reply-To: einari@rhi.hi.is (Einar Indridason) Organization: University of Iceland (RHI) Lines: 27 In article <14614@s.ms.uky.edu> sean@ms.uky.edu (Sean Casey) writes: >guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes: > >|>There are usually good reasons for masking the eighth bit, > >|No, there aren't. > Right. There aren't good reasons anymore for masking the 8th bit. > >I'd *love* to have a world standard, and to have a set of guidelines for >meeting that standard. Until then, my software is not allowing 8-bit data >to be shoved at terminals because only a small percent of terminals are >going to be able to make sense out of it. Use ISO 8859-1. If your software is not going to allow 8-bit data, could you then PLEASE make it optional (via #define'd constant or environment variable) so the rest of us could use the full 8-bit? --- I just learned a new curse: "You #$@! son of SCROLLBAR!" Internet: einari@rhi.hi.is | 'Just give me my command line and throw UUCP: ..!mcsun!isgate!rhi!einari | the GUIs in the dust-bin!!!!!!!!!'