Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!longway!std-unix
From: std-unix@longway.TIC.COM (Moderator, John S. Quarterman)
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: extending 1003.1 to include sym links
Message-ID: <588@longway.TIC.COM>
Date: 22 Mar 90 07:52:01 GMT
References: <580@longway.TIC.COM> <586@longway.TIC.COM>
Reply-To: Ronald Guilmette <uunet!ics.UCI.EDU!rfg>
Organization: UC Irvine Department of ICS
Lines: 21
Approved: jsq@longway.tic.com (Moderator, John S. Quarterman)

From: Ronald Guilmette <uunet!ics.UCI.EDU!rfg>

In article <586@longway.TIC.COM> Clive Feather <uunet!relay.EU.net!ixi!clive> writes:
>
>The functions that operate on links rather than the file pointed to are:
>
>    lstat() readlink() rename() remove() rmdir() symlink() unlink()
>
>The effects of the following functions form an open issue:
>
>    chown() chmod() link() utime()

Those may be an "open issue" as far as POSIX is concerned, but I call them
an "open wound" as far as actual UNIX implementations are concerned.

I get unhappy each time I need to do something like an lchmod() and
realize (again) that there is no such thing.  Sigh :-(

// rfg

Volume-Number: Volume 19, Number 19