Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!prls!pyramid!cbmvax!daveh From: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga outclassed Message-ID: <10297@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 22 Mar 90 08:17:11 GMT References: <90078.164636JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu> <11886@vdsvax.crd.ge.com> Reply-To: daveh@cbmvax (Dave Haynie) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 45 In article <11886@vdsvax.crd.ge.com> perley@trub (Donald P Perley) writes: >In article <90078.164636JKT100@psuvm.psu.edu>, JKT100@psuvm (JKT) writes: >>>- An intelligent input/output subsystem: The new system employs dedicated >>>input/output processors and a Small Computer System Interface/Direct Memory >>>Access Controller; >Gee, sort of like the amiga... Well, at least they didn't call their DMA controller a "mainframe on a chip". At least now there's a chance that a 40MHz, 32-bit Mac will have a faster hard disk than an A500. I'm interested in seeing just how clever this is -- if it's not a high speed, full 32 bit controller with buffer/FIFO, they can go back to the drawing board. >>>- Richer expansion capabilities: The Macintosh IIfx includes an expansion >>>slot tied directly to the processor in addition to its six industry-standard >>>NuBus slots. >It's not clear what they mean here... like a piggy back board on the '030? Same basic idea as the A2000 -- a machine-specific CPU slot thingy for processor expansion (works only on Mac IIfx), and an Apple-standard expansion bus that can support I/O, graphics, coprocessors, etc. >>It just looks as if this thing with Multifinder really could go faster than >>any 25 MHz Amiga with an '030 on the board ... >It sound to me that a lot of it is apple introducing things that are already >available on the amiga. It sounds like they're catching up with much of the rest of the world, HW wise. Competing with PClones in the mid 80's didn't require any amazing hardware performance -- folks bought Macs for the software only. But now every machine out there is using a GUI, and the competition in both the Clone and Workstation markets has exaggerated the relatively low CPU-bag/buck on the older Mac IIs. >-don perley >perley@trub.crd.ge.com -- Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Systems Engineering) "The Crew That Never Rests" {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh PLINK: hazy BIX: hazy Too much of everything is just enough