Xref: utzoo comp.sys.apple:23706 comp.sys.mac:50826 comp.sys.apple2:220
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!fwi.uva.nl!kim!freek
From: freek@fwi.uva.nl (Freek Wiedijk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Accepting the Mac (was Re: More Macweek Rumors)
Message-ID: <537@fwi.uva.nl>
Date: 17 Mar 90 13:32:59 GMT
References: <1848@crash.cts.com> <18491@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <12667@thorin.cs.unc.edu>
Sender: news@fwi.uva.nl
Reply-To: freek@fwi.uva.nl (Freek Wiedijk)
Followup-To: comp.sys.apple
Organization: Faculteit Wiskunde & Informatica, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Lines: 12

In article <12667@thorin.cs.unc.edu> certain@washington.cs.unc.edu
(Andrew Certain) writes:
>                                               To say the Mac should be
>thought of as a new Apple II is like giving you a Mac III that won't run
>any of the current Mac software.  How willing would you be to making the
>switch?

You mean the _NeXT_?

--
Freek "the Pistol Major" Wiedijk                  Path: uunet!fwi.uva.nl!freek
#P:+/ = #+/P?*+/ = i<<*+/P?*+/ = +/i<<**P?*+/ = +/(i<<*P?)*+/ = +/+/(i<<*P?)**