Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!ncar!mephisto!ukma!risner From: risner@ms.uky.edu (Shad Fax) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Apple II High-Speed SCSI Card Released Message-ID: <14627@s.ms.uky.edu> Date: 21 Mar 90 08:32:29 GMT References: <39494@apple.Apple.COM> <9087@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> Reply-To: risner@ms.uky.edu (Shad Fax) Organization: U of Kentucky, Mathematical Sciences Lines: 32 High speed SCSI.... 1meg/sec......cool, but its not new....for a long time the Vulcan 100meg internal has been running at 950+/-k per second. Actual test speeds. The posting said up to a meg a sec. This is not a flame on the New SCSI, but more of a pump for the Vulcan 100. I have used it and its FAST. I love the idea of a "no increase in price" killer SCSI card. Sys 6 will be great (hey, ANY improvement over Sys 5 is to be respected. Sys 5 show what the IIgs COULD be) Hypercard GS. Rumor of a ROM 04. Looks to me like Apple is developing for the IIgs even if it is ashamed of it. I am going to use all the money I make over the summer break to buy myself a NEW computer. If that happens to be a IIgs that compares to or betters an Amiga, then it will be a IIgs (my hopes...) If the ROM 04 (due in sept? was it? I will wait until mid-october) is as good as the Amiga, then I will stick with Apple II. If not its off to Amiga land. NO FLAMES please. If the IIgs doesn't match up to the Amiga now, then I don't think it can live more than maybe a year more. Many people said what does an Educantional/Home/Hobbyist computer need to be an Amiga killer? Because if it is it has a much better chance to survive for another 6-8 years....(my opinion. By that time computers will be so advanced/cheap that why stay with the old?) Apple is supporting the II, now why don't you (Apple) tell the world? -- | Thanks, James Risner | They spell it "da Vinci" and pronounce it | ARPA: | "da Vinchy". Foreigners always spell | risner@ms.uky.edu | better than they pronounce. -- Mark Twain