Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!cunyvm!ndsuvm1!plains!blee
From: blee@plains.UUCP (Blaine Lee CME4FUN! )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: SCSI controler...
Message-ID: <3790@plains.UUCP>
Date: 16 Mar 90 03:32:41 GMT
Reply-To: blee@plains.UUCP (Blaine Lee CME4FUN! )
Organization: North Dakota State University, Fargo
Lines: 18


I am puzzled from the inconsistancy I see in SCSI controlers.  I seem
to hear of many problems with the ICD controler, and that the BMS controler
handles more and better commands (group 1).  With that in mind, I look
in most ads and postings and see that ICD predominates...  What am I missing?
They seem even to be listed for the same price, which confuses me even more.

On a side note:  Will someone give me the list of GOOD drives or rather
ones to keep away from (I am thinking about the N series of Seagate).

Concerning Personal Pascal:  I was told that the reason for the mouse
screw-ups were because of improper order of calls... I have no experience
with this, whether this is internal to PP or was caused by the individuals
I have no idea.

Of course I have no connection with Seagate, Berkley Micro Systems, or
ICD...

Blaine Lee
blee @ plains.nodak.edu