Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!unisoft!bdt!bbs
From: MICHAEL_ARTHUR@bdt.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: ST-Report / CPU-Report on Usenet?
Message-ID: <1655@bdt.UUCP>
Date: 18 Mar 90 02:15:37 GMT
Sender: bbs@bdt.UUCP
Reply-To: MICHAEL_ARTHUR@bdt.UUCP
Organization: Beckemeyer Development Tools BBS
Lines: 14

Why do you feel that CPU Report is an:

extremely poor quality "column". If you distributed it to the
newsgroups that it theoretically belongs in, you'd be laughed off of
Usenet. That's just my opinion.

(Greg Lindahl's words quoted above)

And what are your suggestions to make CPU Report at least palatable to you,
anything else?  

I would truly appreciate any comments, "constructive criticism", or
suggestions that you may have for making CPU Report a better column, as
compcomplaints usually have some basis...