Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!amdcad!sun!imagen!atari!portal!portal!cup.portal.com!Duel
From: Duel@cup.portal.com (Omid M Farr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Brain-dead 286 - summary
Message-ID: <27842@cup.portal.com>
Date: 13 Mar 90 01:37:58 GMT
References: <8681@rosevax.Rosemount.COM> <29405@amdcad.AMD.COM>
  <17965@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <38299@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
  <25F9E2B6.20389@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 15

After reading some debate on this topic of the 286 vs. 386, I've come to
wonder what is the advatange of the 486 today? I don't think we can expect
much software to come out for the 486 specifically this year, so is there
really an advantage to owning and using a 486? 
If a 386 runs software made for the 286 (assuming they are at the same clock
rate) at similar speeds, then I take it the 386/486 would follow the same
pattern.
So this is what I think is going on, Please correct me if I am wrong...
A 25 MHz 486 can run software written for the 386 specifically, but a
25 MHz 386 would run the same program at about the same speed, meaning a 486
really doesn't (today) have any advantages unless you intend on writing
software for it.

Is this true? Or does the rule apply only to 286/386?
Thanks.