Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mailrus!ncar!mephisto!mcnc!ecsvax.uncecs.edu!dukeac!kgreen
From: kgreen@dukeac.UUCP (Kendall B Green)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Perstor vs WD1006 RLL
Keywords: HD controllers
Message-ID: <1799@dukeac.UUCP>
Date: 20 Mar 90 02:06:44 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Academic Computing, Duke University, Durham, NC
Lines: 13


I would like comments on Perstore 180 vs WD1006 RLL controllers for
a 386sx using a Seagate 251.  I need to increase the capacity of the HD and I know that Perstor will give me more disk space BUT I also want to 
increase through put.  If I can get 1:1 with the RLL but only 1:2 with
Perstor, then RLL should be faster.  Please E-mail your comments to me.
I will summarize if there is sufficient interest.  Thanks.

Ken Green
-- 
Kendall B. Green
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC 27710
kgreen@dukeac.ac.duke.edu   or ...mcnc!escgate!dukeac!kgreen