Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!clyde.concordia.ca!s3!robert
From: robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (R.Meunier 8516)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Why The Move To RISC Architectures?  ('386 vs. RISC)
Message-ID: <628@s3.ireq.hydro.qc.ca>
Date: 21 Mar 90 14:15:20 GMT
References: <28011@cup.portal.com> <1990Mar20.233504.4946@seri.gov>
Sender: root@s3.ireq.hydro.qc.ca
Reply-To: robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (R.Meunier 8516)
Organization: IREQ, Hydro-Quebec
Lines: 9


	Once a compiler is completed for a RISC Architecture, it should
be easely ported to another one because the RISC instruction between
two RISC microprossesor should be the almost the same.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Meunier                     Institut de Recherche d'Hydro-Quebec
Ingenieur                          1800 Montee Ste-Julie, Varennes
Internet: robert@ireq.hydro.qc.ca  Qc, Canada, J3X 1S1