Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ns-mx!iowasp!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!usc!jarthur!petunia!polyslo!jdudeck
From: jdudeck@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (John R. Dudeck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo C or MSC
Message-ID: <2602972a.42b0@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>
Date: 17 Mar 90 19:59:38 GMT
References: <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> <35104@cci632.UUCP>
Reply-To: jdudeck@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (John R. Dudeck)
Distribution: na
Organization: Cal Poly State University -- San Luis Obispo
Lines: 17

In article <35104@cci632.UUCP> lmm@op632.UUCP (Lance Michel) writes:
>In article <9944@pyr.gatech.EDU> peggy@pyr.UUCP (Cris Simpson) writes:
>>In article <1468@watserv1.waterloo.edu> tom@mims-iri (Tom Haapanen) writes:
>>>>> Do you know of some real and important differences that could move
>>>>> me to select Microsoft C instead of Turbo C ?
>
>NO!
There is some value to using the industry standard for production work.
On the other hand the "real" differences are probably insignificant.
Borland is turning out stuff that is just as rock-solid as Microsoft,
and they are pretty much in the same league.  Borland does have the
advantage of lower cost.

-- 
John Dudeck                           "You want to read the code closely..." 
jdudeck@Polyslo.CalPoly.Edu             -- C. Staley, in OS course, teaching 
ESL: 62013975 Tel: 805-545-9549          Tanenbaum's MINIX operating system.