Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!bu.edu!m2c!wpi!jhallen
From: jhallen@wpi.wpi.edu (Joseph H Allen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo C or MSC
Message-ID: <9771@wpi.wpi.edu>
Date: 18 Mar 90 09:11:50 GMT
References: <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>
Reply-To: jhallen@wpi.wpi.edu (Joseph H Allen)
Distribution: na
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester ,MA
Lines: 14

In article <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> troj@icon.weeg.uiowa.edu () writes:
>In <10125@portia.Stanford.EDU>,  dma@nova.stanford.edu (Domingo Mihovilovic A)
>writes:
>
>>	Do you know of some real and important differences that could move
>>me to select Microsoft C instead of Turbo C ?
>>	Thanks for your comments,
>[good comparison]

Also for turbo C's __emit__() function and the pseudoregisters are invaluable
for MS-DOS programming.  You can make TSRs with no assembly language at all.
-- 
            "Come on Duke, lets do those crimes" - Debbie
"Yeah... Yeah, lets go get sushi... and not pay" - Duke