Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixd.cc.columbia.edu!srg
From: srg@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu (Steven R Gerber)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Turbo C or MSC
Message-ID: <1990Mar18.224731.14201@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 18 Mar 90 22:47:31 GMT
References: <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <9771@wpi.wpi.edu>
Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Reply-To: srg@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu (Steven R Gerber)
Distribution: na
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 28

In article <9771@wpi.wpi.edu> jhallen@wpi.wpi.edu (Joseph H Allen) writes:
>In article <924@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> troj@icon.weeg.uiowa.edu () writes:
>>In <10125@portia.Stanford.EDU>,  dma@nova.stanford.edu (Domingo Mihovilovic A)
>>writes:
>>
>>>	Do you know of some real and important differences that could move
>>>me to select Microsoft C instead of Turbo C ?
>>>	Thanks for your comments,
>>[good comparison]
>
>Also for turbo C's __emit__() function and the pseudoregisters are invaluable
>for MS-DOS programming.  You can make TSRs with no assembly language at all.
>-- 
>            "Come on Duke, lets do those crimes" - Debbie
>"Yeah... Yeah, lets go get sushi... and not pay" - Duke


I don't know what the __emit__() function does.
But, MS-C has pseudo-registers and "you can make TSRs with no assembly
language at all."

****************************************************************
*	Steven R. Gerber - PAL (Programmer At Large)
*	srg@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu
*	Tel:	212-794-8721
*	UUCP:	...rutgers!columbia!cunixd!srg
*	FAX:	212-794-8722
****************************************************************