Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!rick From: rick@Apple.COM (Rick Auricchio) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux Subject: Re: A/UX Release 2.0 Keywords: A/UX Message-ID: <39688@apple.Apple.COM> Date: 21 Mar 90 01:57:54 GMT References: <16611@well.sf.ca.us> <729@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> <306@digigw.lab.digital.co.jp> <7264@goofy.Apple.COM> <1990Mar20.181959.16435@smurf.sub.org> Organization: Apple Computer, Inc. Lines: 36 In article <1990Mar20.181959.16435@smurf.sub.org> urlichs@smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs) writes: >Why not SVR4? Since we've been working on this for over a year, it would've been tough to find a V.4 tape, yes? > >Does the A/UX kernel finally support the Berkeley FFS, and/or the >#!/usr/bin/whatever convention? Or ar these still the "almost" in the above >"almost anything"? Yes, and yes. > >Oh yes, I'd also like to have TIOCCONS instead of /dev/osm, please. Oh, well. Not yet. >(Ever had "tail -f /dev/osm" cause a kernel bus error?) No. >Is there a decent Mac-like text editor? Or the functional equivalent to the >MPW Shell? (Long list of superb MPW shell features, sadly missing from Unix, >omitted.) Yes, adapted from MPW. Called "textedit". >But can you run the Sun binaries on A/UX, and/or vice versa? >(The answer is a very obvious "no", right?) You're right there. But you already know that wasn't a *real* question, right? Not much binary compatibility among systems. >product. It is (good, I mean), but it could be better. What couldn't? True. I expect to be working for a long time perfecting it. The more we add, the more we understand needs a bit of polish here and there. But 2.0 has to ship, so many of us reluctantly have to forego a bit of polish in favor of getting it to everyone. -- -- Rick Auricchio, Apple Computer Inc, 20525 Mariani Av MS 58A Cupertino CA 95014 sun!apple!rick OR rick@apple.COM Mooney N894AR (408) 974-4227 Never eat prunes when you're famished. My opinion is my own. My employer? They use a windsock and a fire extinguisher.