Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!umich!sharkey!wyn386!danielw From: danielw@wyn386.mi.org (Daniel Wynalda) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: any one use the exclan(sp) Keywords: exclan sco xenix-net Message-ID: <212@wyn386.mi.org> Date: 19 Mar 90 14:43:34 GMT References: <248@pride386.UUCP> <376@mplex.UUCP> Reply-To: danielw@wyn386.UUCP (Daniel Wynalda) Distribution: usa Organization: Wynalda Litho Inc, Rockford MI Lines: 33 In article <376@mplex.UUCP> fff@mplex.UUCP (Fred Fierling) writes: >In article <248@pride386.UUCP>, terry@pride386.UUCP (Terry Lyons) writes: >> is ANYONE using the exclan(sp) setup that sco pushes as xenix net? >> would like to create a distributed file system (with 2+ computers) > >We use Xenix Net with Excelan hardware between a 286 and a 386. It works as >advertised, but doesn't break LAN performance records. We find it a bit shaky >when one machine shuts down but that could easily be fixed in the latest >release. I would suggest you look into NFS though, if I understand correctly >it's much more versatile. We use Xenix-net with Excelan hardware between two 386 boxes running Xenix and 1 DOS 286. The file transfer speeds seem to be about the speed of a floppy drive. The previous comment mentions looking at NFS. There are probably advantages to both schemas. One thing that I find useful with Xenix-Net that you don't get with NFS is access to remote devices. Because the ENTIRE FILESYSTEM of the remote computer is on your system, you can access all of the devices etc as well. For example, I use a modem on one machine from a terminal program on the other machine. It works very well. It is, as mentioned, usable but not a screamer. I would recommend it though. All of the excelan utilities work well as well (ftp, telnet, rlogin, rsh, rpr etc) Daniel Wynalda -- Daniel Wynalda | Telephone: (616) 866-1561 X22 Ham: N8KUD Wynalda Litho Inc. | danielw@wyn386.UUCP danielw@wyn386.mi.org 8221 Graphic Ind Pk. | I believe everyone should be responsible for their own Rockford, MI 49341 | actions. Thus I don't speak for this org. herein.