Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!udel!princeton!phoenix!jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV
From: aloise@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Jim Aloise)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.eastern
Subject: Re: Taoism
Message-ID: <14554@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 15 Mar 90 14:42:58 GMT
References: <14530@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Sender: mukund@phoenix.Princeton.EDU
Lines: 14
Approved: mukund@phoenix.Princeton.EDU

In article <14530@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> ciula@cis.ohio-state.edu (Kim Ciula) writes:
%
%	The tao that can be told
%	is not the eternal Tao.
%	The name that can be named
%	is not the eternal Name.
%
%	The unnamable is the eternally real.
%	Naming is the origin
%	of all particular things.


How about a discussion of what this means - as far as we're able to talk about
the unnamable, that is.