Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: function calls Message-ID: Date: 24 Mar 90 15:55:10 GMT References: <6283@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <14288@lambda.UUCP> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 8 In article <14288@lambda.UUCP> jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles) writes: > Actually, what I'v been saying is that registers are an important resource > (no matter how many or few you have) and that not using them to the full > extent possible is wasteful. So why are you against register windows, which allow you to put more of this important resource on a chip without slowing it down by making the register address incredibly wide? -- _--_|\ `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . / \ 'U` \_.--._/ v