Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!targon!gert From: gert@targon.UUCP (Gert Kanis) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: Fixes and Update Patches... Summary: Official patches should not rely on "net fixes" Keywords: updates fixes patch Message-ID: <1107@targon.UUCP> Date: 27 Mar 90 14:34:22 GMT References: <1990Mar26.145023.26314@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Reply-To: gert@targon.UUCP (Gert Kanis) Followup-To: comp.os.minix Organization: Nixdorf Computer BV., DO, P.O. Box 29,Vianen, The Netherlands Lines: 28 In article <1990Mar26.145023.26314@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> wall-rt@cscosl.ncsu.edu (Richard Todd Wall) writes: > > When AST posts the update files for Minix, and then other users who >apply the fixes and find errors in the update code post their fixes, does >the next set of update patches (i.e. 1.5.3 to 1.5.5) assume you have >already applied each of the little fixes that were posted by various users. >Or does it assume you haven't done anything to the original code and the >patch file looks for the previous errors and fixes it???? >o o ______ _ _____ _ _ o o mcnc!bacchus!beretta!todd >' ' / / / ' ) / // // ' ' or wall-rt@cscosl.ncsu.edu No , the `official update' should not assume that you have aplied ANY fixes. At least this is my opinion about the subject. How could the next update know what you did if: - there were several `net fixes' for the same problem. - you fixed it yourself (without posting). It would cause (and probably has caused now and then) a lot of problems for people who try hard to keep up with AST's version of MINIX. (see the discussion under : upgrade problems) +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | No more jokes they | Gert Kanis, ASW CBS SWP | | take to much space. | Nixdorf Computer BV, Postbus 29 | |----------------------| 4130 EA Vianen, Netherlands. | | I do not represent | E-mail : ... nluug.nl!targon!gert | | anyone elses opinion.| or {..uunet!mcsun!}hp4nl!targon!gert | +-----------------------------------------------------------------+