Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!unido!uklirb!gerten From: gerten@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de (Rainer Gerten) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2 Subject: Re: Why Isn't Microsoft Replying ???? Summary: Don't woory, that's typical ! Message-ID: <3309@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de> Date: 26 Mar 90 16:08:13 GMT References: <771@nixsin.UUCP> Reply-To: gerten@uklirb.UUCP (Rainer Gerten) Organization: University of Kaiserslautern, W-Germany Lines: 80 In article <771@nixsin.UUCP> lima@nixsin.UUCP (Arthur Lim) writes: >Hello everyone in the Netland, > >I have this frustrating experience in dealing with MS that I have to air >hoping that I can get some answers. > >I bought the MS OS/2 SDK from MS directly last year (1989) and got the SDK >version 1.06. Although it was promised in the package that I would get >continuous update till the final release, I received no news about the >release of the SDK 1.1 from MS even though "the world" is already using and >discussing about SDK 1.1. After several faxes (refaxes) and phone calls, I >finally got hold of the information I needed to order the update from the >International Customer Service. > >A couple of months later, this net is filled with discussions about the 1.2. >Even the release (?) of 2.0 for developers was heard. Again I wrote a fax to >the International Customer Service requesting for update information. And >months later, I have still to get a reply from MS. > >This experiences has set me wondering. What is happening at MS International >Customer Service ? Why are they not replying ? Has anyone similar experience >to tell me what's going on ? > >Could anyone kindly fill me in with the details/information on how I can get >hold of the OS/2 1.2 (and subsequently 2.0) without these hassles ? > >Thanks to anyone who could enlighten me. > Here's another OS/2-story: We bought in August 1987 MS OS/2 SDK Ver. 1.0 with DIAL-Support and so on for DM 8000,- !. This covered regular updates until the final release of Ver. 1.1 PM. This happend: Ver. 1.0 was't able to install on PS/2 (this was us told when we had payed the kit). Half a year later we got SDK 1.0 Ver. 1.01 and we installed it (with a lot of pain !), but it had a lot of problems. Some months ago we got SDK Ver. 1.02, but the bugs were so many, that we didn't use it. Then nothing happend for a while, after that we got Ver. 1.03 and 1.04 (at the same time). There was a part of LAN-Man. and an upgrade for 1.02 with PM. A year later we were asked, if we wanted to continue the mail-support. I told to MS, that: - the MS DIAL-support was awful, because the communication-connections (over Datex-P) seldom worked. - the answers on DIAL TAR's constisted only of promises, no solutions - we were waiting for the final OS/2 update and never got it. (The original OS/2 1.1 was then sold by IBM to regular users!). - We stopped any OS/2-Development because of the significantly bad support. A technical engineer called me and we talked a while about the problems and he promised me, that we should get the update. One week later we got two updates, SDK Ver. 1.05 and 1.06, neither completly working. I phoned again, they told me to wait for SDK Ver. 1.07. I am still waiting!!! Thats a story of OS/2-support over here in old germany. Some questions, wy some people are angry ? Until we get better support (for that lot of money) we 'll wait with OS/2- development. This means not, that we dislike OS/2, but we can't throw money away. We have similar problems with MS-Windows (286 and 386) Ver. 2.11 with the support from MS. (Bought updates for Windows and had problems, only answer: some useless hints and no real solution or correction; wait for Windows 3.0). QUESTION to MS: Are you really shure, that you want to compete with UNIX, if this way of support stays on? Resumee: I personally would prefer OS/2, but until I have no final OS/2 1.1 I will continue using DOS (partially Windows) for applications and UNIX for development. This includes no OS/2 course over here too. Rainer Gerten University of Kaiserslautern mail: gerten@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de