Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: UltraCard vs CanDo
Keywords: hypertext, hypermedia, hypercard, hyperetc.
Message-ID: <1990Mar25.034606.25846@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: 25 Mar 90 03:46:06 GMT
References: <13271@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM>
Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 18

In article <13271@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM> raf@PRC.Unisys.COM (Ralph A. Foy) writes:
>It's about time to by my machine a present, and after hearing about
>some of the wonderful things Mac users do with hypercard,  I was considering
>getting either UltraCard or CanDo. Mary from Safe Harbor said that her
>husband and son prefer CanDo, but frankly I never heard of it.
>
	From my experience it is easy to make professional looking
applications with CanDo. CanDo is much easier to use and is very
flexible. Although UltraCard may have a lot of potential I think that
it is very difficult to get good results from it. Even Mike Lehman's
own programs which were I'm sure worked on quite a bit didn't visually
look good, IMHO. Try both. That's the best idea.
	-- Ethan

Ethan Solomita: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu

"If Commodore had to market sushi they'd call it `raw cold fish'"
		-- The Bandito, inevitably stolen from someone else