Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!tut!santra!capella.hut.fi!ayr From: ayr@capella.hut.fi (Ari Yrj|l{) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: SCSI & RAM for A2000? Message-ID: <1990Mar29.131604.8489@santra.uucp> Date: 29 Mar 90 13:16:04 GMT References: <[2610a822:164.1]comp.sys.amiga.hardware;1@wcbcs> Sender: news@santra.uucp (Cnews - USENET news system) Reply-To: ayr@capella.hut.fi (Ari Yrj|l{) Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Lines: 24 In article <[2610a822:164.1]comp.sys.amiga.hardware;1@wcbcs> akcs.clemon@wcbcs (Craig Lemon) writes: >As far as I'm concerned the HardFrame 2000 is THE best controller out there. > It has performed flawlessly on my A2000 w/Q105S since the day I got it. It >only has minimal slowdown of about 50K/sec when using Interlace, 16colour, >overscan screen and normally transfers about 750K/sec. I'm quite pleased with my HardFrame w/Q80S too, but how do people get those transfer speeds? I have only 1 MB without new Agnus, maybe that's why I get a only little over 500K/s (?) Oh, and that's with diskperf (a version modified to run on 1 MB amiga...). Last saturday I got terminal line to my apartment (max 38400 bps but with amiga's standard serial port only 19200) and I get sometimes blurps of checksum errors from dnet when writing to HD...I guess serial.device or dnet don't get enough time-cycles 'cause HF takes "too" much...any ideas? Well, I got successful transfers but those errors are annoying when you should be having THE best controller :-) --> // This msg is sent by: Ari Yrjola + Internet: ayrjola@hut.fi -->:: // Address: JMT 3B 231b + BITNET: lk-ay@finhut.bitnet --> :X/ 02150 ESPOO ,Finland,Europe + VoiceNet: +358-0-468 3088 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````