Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.lans:4680 comp.sys.att:9143
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!trwind!venice!greene
From: greene@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM (John Greene)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Twisted pair (StarLan) to ThinNet
Keywords: LAN twisted thinnet
Message-ID: <430@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM>
Date: 29 Mar 90 17:11:15 GMT
References: <405@ohsuhcx.ohsu.edu>
Reply-To: greene@venice.sedd.trw.com (John Greene)
Organization: TRW System Engineering and Development Division
Lines: 24

In article <405@ohsuhcx.ohsu.edu> bj@ohsuhcx.ohsu.edu (Bill Jackson) writes:
>Has anyone found a good way to bring ThinNet into a twisted pair (StarLan)
>network?  I have a campus network based on StarLan components from AT&T and
>
>Is the problem a lack of a twisted pair standard?  The Synoptics stuff was all
>billed for their LatticeNet stuff - is this not the same as StarLan? 
>

First thing is that you are mixing two different things here.  Literally, you
can bridge between ThinNet and StarLan using a Mac Layer Bridge such as made
by Retix.  StarLan is a 1 MegaBit/Sec twisted pair network.  The Synoptics 
stuff is an implementation of 10 MBit/sec twisted pair which is in the process
of being standardized as 10baseT.  I think that StarLan carries a standard of
1base5 (I think).  It's been five years since I messed with any of this stuff. 

In short, No, Synoptics is not the same as StarLan.  Unless it is their series
3000 stuff, it's not 10baseT either.


-- 
John E. Greene    "People are just like frankfurters....You have to decide
                   if you're going to be a hot dog or just another wiener" DLR
TRW Systems Engineering and Development Division
INTERNET: greene@venice.sedd.TRW.COM  USENET: ..trwrb!venice!greene