Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdsu!crash!pnet01!jca
From: jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: ESDI or SCSI or RLL?
Message-ID: <1970@crash.cts.com>
Date: 25 Mar 90 20:16:03 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Lines: 22

MHS108@psuvm.psu.edu (Mark Solsman) writes:
>Well, most people out there seem to think that scsi is the fastest and edsi
>gets you more bang for the buck.
>I saw an advertisment for Jameco: EDSI $169.95  @  15m/bits / second
>                                  SCSI $349.96  @  10m/bits / second
>seems like esdi is better all the way around!
>
>any comments?

I think Jameco sells the WD ESDI controller for that price, oh well.  I still
would go with ESDI for the sake of my wallet and overall support.
 
     // JCA

 /*
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 ** Flames  : /dev/null                     | My opinions are exactly that,
 ** ARPANET : crash!pnet01!jca@nosc.mil     | mine.  Bill Gates couldn't buy
 ** INTERNET: jca@pnet01.cts.com            | it, but he could rent it.  :)
 ** UUCP    : {nosc ucsd hplabs!hd-sdd}!crash!pnet01!jca
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 */