Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!maccs!cs4g6ag
From: cs4g6ag@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Stephen M. Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Procomm - - Something Bet
Message-ID: <260EB804.17139@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Date: 27 Mar 90 00:47:00 GMT
References: <90032502290027@masnet.uucp> <1990Mar25.200722.27200@uncecs.edu>
Reply-To: cs4g6ag@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Stephen M. Dunn)
Organization: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
Lines: 15

In article <1990Mar25.200722.27200@uncecs.edu> mvolo@uncecs.edu (Michael R. Volow) writes:
$I'm also considering switching from Procomm+ to Telix because of the
$internal Zmodem (although the next Procomm+ version may have this).
$Does Telix allow big packet Kermit or Super Kermit?

   As far as I can tell, it only supports plain vanilla Kermit (i.e. up
to 94-byte packets).

   One thing I like about it, though, is that I have yet to make it
crash.  I cannot say the same thing for Procomm's Kermit.
-- 
               More half-baked ideas from the oven of:
****************************************************************************
Stephen M. Dunn                               cs4g6ag@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca
     <std_disclaimer.h> = "\nI'm only an undergraduate ... for now!\n";