Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!vax8530!tt3x
From: tt3x@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: RE: Pc Mag video tests
Message-ID: <3725.2610002d@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
Date: 28 Mar 90 04:07:09 GMT
References: <533@cica.cica.indiana.edu> <1640089@hpspcoi.HP.COM>
Distribution: comp
Lines: 19


> 
> This issue is the current issue. It can be found at any news stand.
> This magazine also be found in just about any library. Why read
> a summary when you can go to the original source material?
> In fact I find the summary that PC Magazine and InfoWorld
> print in their comparison reports to be most UNuseful. Their
> criteria for select a Best Choice is sufficiently different from
> mine that half the time, I totally disagree with their recommendations.
> However the details in the actual reports are usually enough for me
> to make my own decisions.
> 
> 			   Danny Low
>     "Question Authority and the Authorities will question You"
> 	   Valley of Hearts Delight, Silicon Valley
>      HP SPCD   dlow%hpspcoi@hplabs.hp.com   ...!hplabs!hpspcoi!dlow 

	I have the issue now and I question their choices of cards.  Where
did they get the cardinal from???  I guess they can't do everything...