Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!amdcad!pepsi!phil
From: phil@pepsi.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: ESDI or SCSI or RLL?
Message-ID: <29641@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: 27 Mar 90 17:53:59 GMT
References: <18758@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <25100007@adaptex>
Sender: news@amdcad.AMD.COM
Reply-To: phil@pepsi.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 14

In article <25100007@adaptex> neese@adaptex.UUCP writes:
|SCSI is more of a pain to move to due to the fact that there is not a standard
|in the industry for it.  Adaptec, WD, Future Domain, and others all
|have a SCSI adapter boards, but none of them are compatible with the others.

Is this ever going to get better? I refuse to consider SCSI as long
as things are screwed up this way.



--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
Boycott the census! With the history of abuse census data has,
can you afford to trust the government?