Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!willett!dwp From: dwp@willett.UUCP (Doug Philips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer Subject: Re: Best C Compiler Message-ID: <705.UUL1.3#5129@willett.UUCP> Date: 24 Mar 90 01:11:40 GMT References: <3207@uudell.dell.com> Organization: Latest link in the ForthNet chain. (Pgh, PA) Lines: 36 In <3207@uudell.dell.com>, jrh@mustang.dell.com (James R. Howard) writes: > In article <2940@alpha.cam.nist.gov>, koontz@cam.nist.gov (John E. > Koontz X5180) writes: > > If I may humbly enquire, is the MIX's Power C any good? It seems to be very > > inexpensive, at $40.00 for compiler and debugger. > > I bought a copy of it quite a while back. It seemed fairly good, > especially for > the price, which at the time was $25. A couple problems that I noticed at the > time were: I paid $50 for compiler, debugger and library source. > Compiler was slow, and I think it only supported certain memory > models. I have version 1.3.0 (No idea what current version is). It only supports the medium memory model. I have no feel for the speed of the compiler, I don't have MSC or Turbo or anything else to compare it to. > I believe that .EXE program execution was very fast, the optimizer was quite > good, and blew away both MSC and TC on some standard benchmarks. It was also > one of the first to have VGA support in the libraries I believe. It also has floating point support second only to WatCom (the best) and a small fraction of the cost. On the PC mags a while back rated compilers and MIX did very well. It doesn't have an integrated environment, at least not the version they had out when I bought it, but I (personally) hate such things anyway. I haven't been using it much since I'm not doing much PC programming anymore. Its a *great* value. Especially since you can get library source. I'm not affliated with MIX except as a very happy customer. -Doug --- Preferred: willett!dwp@gateway.sei.cmu.edu OR ...!sei!willett!dwp Daily: ...!{uunet,nfsun}!willett!dwp [in a pinch: dwp@vega.fac.cs.cmu.edu]