Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!calgary!cpsc!sharp From: sharp@cpsc.ucalgary.ca (Maurice Sharp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: A/UX 2.0 Great ... But who can afford it ? Message-ID: <2637@cs-spool.calgary.UUCP> Date: 24 Mar 90 00:27:20 GMT References: <10312@cbmvax.commodore.com> <2629@cs-spool.calgary.UUCP> <5363@paperboy.OSF.ORG> <5437@paperboy.OSF.ORG> Sender: news@calgary.UUCP Reply-To: sharp@ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca.UUCP (Maurice Sharp) Organization: Knowledge Science Lab, U. of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Lines: 35 Hiya, >> In article <5363@paperboy.OSF.ORG> mbrown@osf.org (Mark Brown) writes: >I stand corrected, here. >It's still a non-expandable (in the sense that a PC or Mac is) diskless >workstation, no? Actually yes it is. SCSI and AT bus on are on it. But it was offered mearly as an example. If you want others, look at the IBM 6000 series. Yes it is a bit more expensive, but it also runs one hell of a lot faster. I must admin, I am an IBM hater from way back, but the 6000 is impresive. My point is that Apple is STILL way overpriced. Others are releasing stuff that is cheaper and more powerful. What is more, with stuff like X, Motif, NeXt step (comes with the 6000) etc, Mac is no longer the only easy to use interface on the block. It is only a matter of time before hoards of programs appear that use the new interface *standards*. I like Mac, but currently, they are pricing themselves out of the market. And there is not need, just scam a look at a developer price list. If they sold for 15-25% over that price, they would be laughing. What they lost in markup they would make up in volume. I ask again, come on Apple, why are you so expensive ? maurice PS I do own a ci, it cost most of my savings, but I like it. Maurice Sharp MSc. Student University of Calgary Computer Science Department 2500 University Drive N.W. sharp@ksi.cpsc.UCalgary.CA Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 ...!alberta!calgary!sharp