Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ns-mx!iowasp!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!pacbell!hoptoad!fidogate!f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Randy.Shaw
From: Randy.Shaw@f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Randy Shaw)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Searching For Inexpensive V.
Message-ID: <3708.26100CA5@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 27 Mar 90 00:22:48 GMT
Sender: ufgate@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:161/555 - MacCircles, Pleasanton CA
Lines: 13

Well, one mans garbage is another mans jewel. I set my clients up with 
MultiTech MultiModems regularly with excellent results. Using one now, it 
does not smell too bad. Perhaps the gentleman with the gripe might care to 
get a little more specific... one person I found that hate the MultiModem, 
turns out he hates the V.32 standard in general...some obscure technical 
reason. But for the rest of us, any international standard for 9600bps is a 
welcome one. And, I seem to have no problem with logging on to BBS's all over 
at 9600bps, and getting fast file transfers...

--  
Randy Shaw - via FidoNet node 1:125/777
    UUCP: ...!sun!hoptoad!fidogate!161!555!Randy.Shaw
INTERNET: Randy.Shaw@f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG