Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!helios!tamunix!n245bq
From: n245bq@tamunix (Keith Perkins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: What NeXT *should* do next.
Message-ID: <4662@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Date: 25 Mar 90 00:50:42 GMT
References: <1378@shelby.Stanford.EDU> <9967@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <424@toaster.SFSU.EDU> <Eqe#zm3@cs.psu.edu> <35@isl.stanford.edu>
Sender: usenet@helios.TAMU.EDU
Reply-To: n245bq@tamunix.tamu.edu (Keith Perkins)
Organization: Texas A&M University
Lines: 7

Adding a chip to do Postscript crunching for the Printer wouldn't be a
bad idea, IMHO. The performance slowdown when printing is a real pain!

Keith Perkins
Texas A&M University
Internet: n245bq@tamunix.tamu.edu
Bitnet : kdp9565@tamvenus