Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!auriga!krynos!joerg From: joerg@krynos.mcs.anl.gov Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Next NeXT Message-ID: <4000010@krynos> Date: 29 Mar 90 01:57:00 GMT References: <205146@<1990Mar27> Lines: 29 Nf-ID: #R:<1990Mar27:205146:krynos:4000010:000:1625 Nf-From: krynos.mcs.anl.gov!joerg Mar 28 19:57:00 1990 NeXT listens. This is neither a wild guess nor a fact know to me, but hey, comp.sys.next is free market research -- albeit slanted more towards the UNIX guy in the .gov or .edu workplaces. They have their business customers to go after too. Anyway, they listen. It seems that NeXT is trying pretty hard to not acquire the image of a "vaporware criminal". Of course, rumors get started and then someone reads it as fact, and suddenly NeXT's reputation suffers, but they can't do anything about that really. Someone made a very good point in saying that NeXT should give an idea of the DIRECTION their products are headed, if they are reluctant to discuss the actual content of their plans. The idea here is to give enough of the "spirit" of new NeXT releases that potential customers feel reassured, but to make it very clear that NeXT will not discuss the specifics of any new release or make commitments on when it will be availible to the public. That's a fine line to tread, but with careful forethought, the balancing-act could work out very profitably for NeXT. Someone else also made a good point in that all this speculation under NeXT's "gag order" is a big waste of time unless people have substantially reliable rumors. Why don't we concentrate on telling NeXT (and the rest of the NeXT software development world) what we'd like to see in the ways of hardware and software, and organize groups ourselves to write the software we want? David Joerg (joerg@alliant.mcs.anl.gov) /* I only grudgingly take responsibility for my actions, */ /* because nobody else will. (including argonne nat'l lab) */