Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!goofy.apple.com!mikel
From: mikel@goofy.apple.com (Mikel Evins)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux
Subject: Re: MacX (Was- Which X11 for A/UX 1.1.1 or 2.0?)
Keywords: Mac,Macintosh,A/UX,MacX,MacIIfx,Sun
Message-ID: <7444@goofy.Apple.COM>
Date: 29 Mar 90 00:59:31 GMT
References: <3029@goanna.oz.au> <2323@husc6.harvard.edu> <6320@umd5.umd.edu> <1990Mar27.063925.15407@nixter.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@Apple.COM
Reply-To: mikel@goofy.apple.com (Mikel Evins)
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
Lines: 21


Obviously I can't say anything about when MacX will be available. I can say
that I have used it, and it is very handy indeed. If you can't wait for the
release, you might look at White Pine software's eXodus product.
--me


In article <3029@goanna.oz.au>, pnm@goanna.oz.au (Paul Big-Ears Menon) writes:
> dumais@nixter.UUCP (Paul E. Dumais) writes:
> ...
> >Finally, MacX is very cool if you want X Window clients on the same
screen as
> >your Mac O/S applications and your Console sessions.
> 
> Great.  So when do we see MacX running on the Mac O/S only?  The rumour mill
> started with last Q '89, then 1st Q '90.  Now the latest is 3rd Q '90.
> What's the poop guys? I want to hang on to my Mac, but I need X too (without
> the o/head of AUX).
> 
> Paul Menon
> pnm@goanna.cs.rmit.OZ.AU