Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: SCO support for Xenix (or lack of).
Message-ID: <720@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 25 Mar 90 22:24:16 GMT
References: <2322@promark.UUCP> <36@choreo.COM> <685@sixhub.UUCP> <2609352D.C52@tct.uucp> <5377@questar.QUESTAR.MN.ORG>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 17

In article <5377@questar.QUESTAR.MN.ORG> jeff@hobbes.QUESTAR.MN.ORG (Jeff Holmes) writes:

| 	On this note, do any of the other Unix'es offer source
| 	level debuggers? One of the main reasons SCO Unix is
| 	attractive to me is Codeview. If I can somehow get
| 	GDB running it won't be an issue, but I don't know
| 	the chances of that yet. Some have said, "good luck".

  WHo cares? The development set and the o/s are not restricted to work
only with each other. I'm told by two people that the SCO UNIX dev. set
works just fine under ix386. That gives you Codeview and cross
compilation, too.
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me