Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!iuvax!ndcvb!cartan!ndmath!nstar!comcon!tim From: tim@comcon.UUCP (Tim Brown) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: computone Summary: consensys boards... Keywords: Computone Message-ID: <364@comcon.UUCP> Date: 28 Mar 90 17:57:46 GMT References: <511270@nstar.UUCP> <2607C48F.30CF@tct.uucp> <2326@promark.UUCP> Organization: Computer Connection, Anchorage Alaska Lines: 30 In article <2326@promark.UUCP>, mark@promark.UUCP (Mark J. DeFilippis) writes: > > Also, that Consensys board which is polled as opposed to interrupt driven, > anyone tried out that board? It has been around for a while now, there > must be some guinea pigs out there with some performance reports. > Guinea pig is right! I have been using the consensys board for about a year now in two different systems. Ths older ones were better than the one they offer now. After tech support and such I finally got the old ones working, wish I could say the same for the new ones. They do most things well and I really like the multiple sessions but they fall down on telecomunications. I have to implement hardware handshaking and run at max speed of 2400 baud or uucp throws up errors. I have been waiting to post this untill thier tech support got back to me but alas, no call. I was told by a very rude individual there to put my problems in writing or put up! I finally convinced him to give me a usenet address and an individual to respond to and I wrote a lengthy discription of the problem. I heard nothing. There tech support used to be good, don't know what happened to them. They have always had a problem with modem communications in my view and shouldn't be used for that application. The first time I purchased one of these boards it took months to get it worked out, guess I am out of patience. Tim Brown | Computer Connection | uunet!iuvax.cs.indiana.edu!ndmath!nstar!comcon!tim |