Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!wuarchive!decwrl!shelby!lindy!news
From: LC.YRS@forsythe.stanford.edu (Richard Stanton)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: LZEXE - Is it too good to be true?
Message-ID: <8847@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 8 Apr 90 07:20:01 GMT
Sender: news@lindy.Stanford.EDU (News Service)
Distribution: usa
Lines: 13

In article <23005@watdragon.waterloo.edu>,
sbnicol@rose.waterloo.edu (Scott Nicol) writes:
>file).  Also, there is an UNLZEXE program, which should be able to
>recover the original from the compressed program.
>
I had problems using UNLZEXE on MS-KERMIT 3.00 which I had
compressed using LZEXE .90 (NOT .91). It reported everything being
OK, and knew which compressor version I had used, but the newly
decompressed program did not work. I haven't had this with any
programs compressed with the new version of LZEXE, and I use this
for a lot of my large .EXE files. It seems great.

Richard Stanton