Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tellab5!segel
From: segel@tellab5.tellabs.com (Mike Segel)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Re: Honesty/ Problems With Informix Turbo Engine
Message-ID: <2381@tellab5.tellabs.com>
Date: 9 Apr 90 17:59:19 GMT
References: <1990Mar28.000821.28170@aqdata.uucp> <1033@fiver.UUCP> <2322@tellab5.tellabs.com> <261A3974.25FC@tct.uucp> <3801@infmx.UUCP>
Reply-To: segel@tellab5.UUCP (Mike Segel)
Organization: Tellabs, Inc. Lisle IL
Lines: 27

In article <3801@infmx.UUCP> davek@infmx.UUCP (David Kosenko) writes:
>
Gee Dave, I thought I posted a disclaimer on the top of my posting ... :-)

	Now Dave, are you going to tell me that Informix does not use
a form of cost analysis to decide what bugs to fix and when?

Or that if a bug has a known work around, that it will drop in priority to
a bug which does not ? (Depending on the severity of the bug)

I could go on Dave, but I won't. The point is that ALL Software Companies
have to provide some method of cost analysis when supporting the product.
No company has a fault free method of doing so. Informix does have its faults
However one should not go product bashing in the interim. 


>
>Dave Kosenko
>Informix Professional Services
>
>-- 
>Disclaimer:  The opinions expressed herein | There's more than one answer
>are by no means those of Informix Software | to these questions pointing me
>(though they make you wonder about the     | in a crooked line...
> strange people they hire).                | 

-Mike Segel