Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.modems:5591 comp.unix.xenix:10970 comp.unix.i386:4043
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!iuvax!ndcvb!cartan!ndmath!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.i386,fido.unix
Subject: Re: Error-correcting modems & uucp
Summary: flow control or not?
Message-ID: <511445@nstar.UUCP>
Date: 7 Apr 90 19:42:15 GMT
References: <963@frcs.UUCP> <21466@nuchat.UUCP>
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Northern Star, Notre Dame, IN USA
Lines: 12

In article <21466@nuchat.UUCP>, steve@nuchat.UUCP (Steve Nuchia) writes:
> 
> Run with the speed locked at 19200 and NO flow control, unless it
> gives you problems with specific neighbors.  The uucp protocol

In my case, I need flow control since the machine is used for other
protocols besides UUCP (ie: zmodem, ymodem, sealink and various
others).  If someone only uses uucp - no flow control
might work for them - but these other protocols require flow control -
or let the modem "float" to the connect rate.
-- 
...!iuvax!ndmath!nstar!larry  -or-  larry@nstar