Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!bridge2!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!iuvax!ndcvb!cartan!ndmath!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,fido.mtask
Subject: Re: HST's vs. Telebits (was Searching for inexpensive V.32...)
Summary: HST for UUCP?
Message-ID: <511488@nstar.UUCP>
Date: 13 Apr 90 13:33:22 GMT
References: <1438@mindlink.UUCP> <139@dynasys.UUCP> <1319@faatcrl.UUCP>
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Northern Star, Notre Dame, IN USA
Lines: 13

In article <1319@faatcrl.UUCP>, jimb@faatcrl.UUCP (Jim Burwell) writes:
> I have heard that USR now makes an HST Dual-Standard-U or something for Unix
> systems, which also has 'g' spoofing (not sure about Kermit or [XY]modem). 
> But even then, I probably wouldn't buy a HST, since they're not nearly as
> good on noisy/bad phone lines as the Telebits under PEP (PEPs a trooper on

The US Robotics solution is to use software running on the OS - completly
replacing the uucp protocol with their own version of it to push the HST
up to 1650 cps.  The problem is that with their software running, normal 
UUCP connections can not be establishe

-- 
...!iuvax!ndmath!nstar!larry  -or-  larry@nstar