Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: nickless@flash.ras.anl.gov (Bill Nickless--A Free Man) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Cellular Phone Reprogramming Message-ID: <6285@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 11 Apr 90 22:06:54 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 82 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 248, Message 7 of 7 In TELECOM Digest Volume 10 : Issue 245 the Moderator writes: > [Moderator's Note: A reader has suggested a series of articles in the > Digest regarding how to program various models of cellular phones. > Included would be a discussion of security and supervisory techniques > used by the carriers to detect fraud. Both the reader and myself feel > that people who buy cell phones (like any other expensive electronic > equipment) are entitled to know how to program their phones and how > they operate. Both of us feel a cell phone user should not be at the > mercy of a salesman or dealer to handle the reprogramming in the event > a change of carrier is desired. What do you think? PT] I recently purchased a cellular "handportable" telephone. Being a student, I found that there were as many as six numbers I would have to provide to somone trying to reach me in an emergency. I felt that if I could get a cellular phone, I could set it to forward to a landline phone local to where I was physically and not miss calls. When I picked up the phone, the salesperson behind the counter faxed in the credit application and received back from Ameritech Mobile a credit authorization/agreement, which included a cellular number. He had obviously never programmed a cellular phone before (he said as much) and had some difficulty following the one-sheet step-by-step instructions provided by the store to program the device. Although the instructions clearly stated "Not to be provided to end-user" on them, he allowed me to copy down the important information -- the "magic code" to put the phone into programming mode. (It's a Nokia Mobira handheld -- the same thing that Radio Shack sells. If anyone wants to know the code I'll E-Mail it to them.) I have the information I would need to reprogram my phone. I would suggest anyone else getting a phone programmed to request the same information. Interestingly, the GE Transportable cellular phone that someone working in my office purchased provided the reprogramming instructions in the owner's manual! Of course, her machine came equipped with dual NAM capability. When it didn't work after being programmed originally, she called the cellular company to ask about some of the parameter settings. Their response was incredulous: "You're trying to reprogram the phone yourself?!!" Now my observations: By the very fact that someone is reading this Digest (or comp.dcom. telecom) assumes a certain level of knowledge about computers, communications, user authentication, and other issues. However, there is a market for cellular phones to people who don't have the background in these areas. I don't believe it is reasonable for the cellular phone companies to expect the end-user to have to program the phone, as there are some very technical parameter settings to worry about. Also, the process itself is rather daunting to someone who doesn't work with computer equipment as a vocation or avocation. Also, having dealt with complex systems (like a cellular phone really is) I know that there are certain things to leave alone until I know I can restore them to some known state. If reprogramming information was available to the general public, we would find a higher percentage of phones being mis-programmed by people not careful or qualified to restore the phones back to their proper state. This would increase the burden on the customer service departments of the cellular phone companies. In summary, I think the information could be made available, but it might cost more to the cellular companies than they feel it is worth. Bill Nickless nickless@flash.ras.anl.gov or bnick@andrews.edu PS: I don't want to come across sounding elitist, but we must recognize systems and policies must be designed while cognizant of the level of sophistication of the individual user. ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest V10 #248 ******************************