Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uflorida!novavax!weiner From: weiner@novavax.UUCP (Bob Weiner) Newsgroups: comp.emacs Subject: Re: Help needed defining C- sequence Summary: Isn't GNU Emacs great? Message-ID: <1862@novavax.UUCP> Date: 6 Apr 90 22:30:38 GMT References: <2086@dover.sps.mot.com> <54499@bbn.COM> Followup-To: comp.emacs Distribution: usa Organization: Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL Lines: 23 In-reply-to: jr@bbn.com's message of 4 Apr 90 13:54:52 GMT Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.47.5 of Tue Sep 15 1987 on novavax (berkeley-unix) In article <54499@bbn.COM> jr@bbn.com (John Robinson) writes: (equal "\C-\e" "\e") => t I knew GNU Emacs was very well written but this one really surprised me. (Of course, if you realize that any valid key code expression may be embedded within a string and it will evaluate to an actual key code, then it's not so surprising, i.e. (length "\C-\e") => 1 and (aref "\C-\e" 0) => 27. People are always telling me that Emacs does this wrong or that wrong when they really should only be saying that their preference is not the default one within GNU Emacs. I've yet to find anything wrong after a number of years of usage, just some things that I had to customize to my own preferences. As Spike Lee says, "Do the Right Thing." Sign up for GNU Emacs usage now. -- Bob Weiner, Motorola, Inc., Usenet: ...!gatech!uflorida!novavax!weiner Internet: novavax!weiner@uunet.uu.net (407) 364-2087